Colorado AI Exposure Atlas
2026 Edition · Employment data 2025 · Compiled by Christopher Martin
The Colorado AI Exposure Atlas estimates, for each of the state's 64 counties, how much of local employment sits in occupations whose tasks overlap substantially with what current AI systems can do. It combines 2025 county employment records with national staffing patterns and published occupation-level AI exposure scores; the result is an exposure score, a rank, and the occupation groups driving each.
Exposure is not a layoff forecast — it maps where change, as augmentation or automation, is positioned to arrive first. Statewide, 23.1% of UI-covered jobs are in high-exposure occupations; measured by payroll the share rises to 26.9%, because exposure skews toward higher-wage office work concentrated along the urban Front Range. Broomfield ranks first among counties at 35.2.
County occupation mixes are estimated from industry mix, not observed directly — the methodology explains how, and where the estimates are weakest.
- Statewide exposure score
- 31.4 0–100 scale, employment-weighted
- UI-covered jobs
- 2,860,276 2025 annual average
- High-exposure share of jobs
- 23.1% score ≥ 50
- High-exposure share of payroll
- 26.9% exposure skews toward higher pay
The map
Employment-weighted AI exposure score. County scores span 24.7–35.2 on a 0–100 scale; the classes cover the observed range.
Heavily imputed county — more than half of employment estimated from suppressed cells
Interactive map loads here. Every county's numbers are in the ranked table.
Key findings
Every statement below is computed from the published dataset; the same figures appear in the county table and the downloads.
-
More than a fifth of Colorado's UI-covered employment — about 661,000 of 2,860,276 jobs, or 23.1% — is in occupations highly exposed to current AI (exposure score 50.0 or more of 100).
-
High-exposure occupations account for 23.1% of Colorado's jobs but 26.9% of its payroll, and the payroll share exceeds the job share in all 64 counties — exposure skews toward higher-wage work. The gap is widest in Gilpin County (13.4% of jobs; 18.6% of payroll).
-
The five highest-scoring counties — Broomfield (35.2), Boulder (34.6), Denver (33.5), Douglas (33.3), and Arapahoe (33.0) — are all Front Range metro counties, and together they hold 44.9% of the state's UI-covered employment.
Broomfield County · Boulder County · Denver County · Douglas County · Arapahoe County
-
County scores span 24.7 (Morgan) to 35.2 (Broomfield) on the 0–100 scale. The share of jobs in high-exposure occupations runs from 14.3% in Morgan County to 30.2% in Broomfield County — more than double.
-
In observed AI usage (Anthropic Economic Index, Sept 2025), Colorado conversations lean toward augmentation over automation — 53.9% to 46.1%, a stronger augmentation lean than the 50.9%-to-49.1% U.S. baseline.
-
In 17 of 64 counties, more than half of employment sits in industry cells suppressed in the public data, so their occupation mixes — and scores — are the most heavily estimated in the atlas. Together these counties hold 1.0% of state employment; the imputed share peaks at 86.4% in Gilpin County.
All 64 counties, ranked
Scores are employment-weighted mean AI exposure on a 0–100 scale (2025 employment). Chip color matches the map classes. Select a column header to sort.
| Rank | County | Exposure score | High-exposure share | UI-covered jobs | Data quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broomfield | 35.2 | 30.2% | 40,750 | Partially imputed 17.5% est. |
| 2 | Boulder | 34.6 | 27.5% | 191,474 | Full |
| 3 | Denver | 33.5 | 27.5% | 560,749 | Full |
| 4 | Douglas | 33.3 | 26.3% | 149,574 | Full |
| 5 | Arapahoe | 33.0 | 26.1% | 340,882 | Full |
| 6 | Crowley | 31.5 | 24.1% | 1,121 | Heavily imputed 54.8% est. |
| 7 | Kiowa | 31.4 | 16.9% | 491 | Partially imputed 47.5% est. |
| 8 | El Paso | 31.4 | 22.2% | 308,056 | Full |
| 9 | Jefferson | 31.3 | 22.8% | 247,212 | Full |
| 10 | Dolores | 31.2 | 20.1% | 526 | Heavily imputed 54.2% est. |
| 11 | Bent | 30.8 | 21.3% | 1,172 | Heavily imputed 55.4% est. |
| 12 | Lincoln | 30.6 | 19.5% | 2,191 | Partially imputed 41.9% est. |
| 13 | Baca | 30.5 | 17.8% | 1,164 | Partially imputed 38.9% est. |
| 14 | Larimer | 30.5 | 20.9% | 171,290 | Full |
| 15 | Park | 30.2 | 20.3% | 3,123 | Partially imputed 29.8% est. |
| 16 | Mineral | 30.0 | 20.3% | 607 | Heavily imputed 63.1% est. |
| 17 | La Plata | 29.7 | 19.6% | 27,323 | Partially imputed 19.3% est. |
| 18 | Hinsdale | 29.6 | 19.2% | 302 | Partially imputed 47.7% est. |
| 19 | Lake | 29.5 | 19.3% | 2,963 | Heavily imputed 54.4% est. |
| 20 | Teller | 29.5 | 18.4% | 8,108 | Partially imputed 42.1% est. |
| 21 | Alamosa | 29.5 | 18.1% | 8,171 | Partially imputed 39.4% est. |
| 22 | Fremont | 29.5 | 18.7% | 14,529 | Partially imputed 24.2% est. |
| 23 | San Juan | 29.5 | 17.9% | 448 | Heavily imputed 75.4% est. |
| 24 | Clear Creek | 29.4 | 18.7% | 3,430 | Heavily imputed 58.2% est. |
| 25 | Otero | 29.3 | 17.7% | 6,032 | Partially imputed 45.0% est. |
| 26 | Custer | 29.3 | 18.2% | 1,026 | Heavily imputed 52.8% est. |
| 27 | Las Animas | 29.2 | 16.9% | 4,636 | Partially imputed 39.4% est. |
| 28 | Sedgwick | 29.1 | 17.0% | 705 | Partially imputed 45.4% est. |
| 29 | Logan | 29.1 | 18.3% | 7,773 | Partially imputed 33.7% est. |
| 30 | Chaffee | 29.1 | 16.9% | 9,346 | Partially imputed 21.0% est. |
| 31 | Jackson | 29.0 | 18.0% | 558 | Heavily imputed 65.2% est. |
| 32 | Rio Blanco | 29.0 | 17.9% | 2,858 | Heavily imputed 50.8% est. |
| 33 | Huerfano | 28.9 | 17.0% | 1,851 | Heavily imputed 57.9% est. |
| 34 | Pueblo | 28.7 | 17.3% | 61,514 | Partially imputed 18.0% est. |
| 35 | Routt | 28.7 | 17.7% | 16,323 | Partially imputed 18.2% est. |
| 36 | Gunnison | 28.7 | 17.4% | 9,438 | Partially imputed 20.8% est. |
| 37 | Montezuma | 28.7 | 16.8% | 9,324 | Partially imputed 31.7% est. |
| 38 | Mesa | 28.6 | 17.6% | 66,883 | Partially imputed 13.6% est. |
| 39 | Pitkin | 28.6 | 17.0% | 17,753 | Partially imputed 12.5% est. |
| 40 | Adams | 28.5 | 19.0% | 249,651 | Full |
| 41 | Moffat | 28.4 | 17.0% | 4,558 | Partially imputed 47.2% est. |
| 42 | Cheyenne | 28.3 | 18.1% | 717 | Heavily imputed 57.6% est. |
| 43 | Washington | 28.3 | 17.0% | 1,213 | Partially imputed 38.3% est. |
| 44 | Ouray | 28.2 | 17.9% | 2,192 | Heavily imputed 60.1% est. |
| 45 | Costilla | 28.2 | 17.9% | 925 | Heavily imputed 53.6% est. |
| 46 | Conejos | 28.2 | 14.9% | 1,649 | Heavily imputed 53.8% est. |
| 47 | Prowers | 28.2 | 16.5% | 4,695 | Partially imputed 37.2% est. |
| 48 | Elbert | 28.2 | 18.5% | 5,141 | Partially imputed 26.7% est. |
| 49 | Garfield | 28.1 | 17.2% | 27,868 | Partially imputed 16.0% est. |
| 50 | Kit Carson | 28.1 | 17.4% | 3,047 | Partially imputed 45.5% est. |
| 51 | Delta | 27.6 | 15.9% | 8,804 | Partially imputed 25.4% est. |
| 52 | Archuleta | 27.6 | 15.4% | 4,898 | Partially imputed 33.3% est. |
| 53 | San Miguel | 27.5 | 16.3% | 6,076 | Partially imputed 46.6% est. |
| 54 | Montrose | 27.3 | 16.6% | 17,497 | Partially imputed 16.6% est. |
| 55 | Grand | 27.3 | 15.1% | 8,193 | Partially imputed 17.7% est. |
| 56 | Summit | 27.2 | 15.0% | 22,484 | Partially imputed 27.6% est. |
| 57 | Yuma | 27.2 | 17.1% | 4,046 | Partially imputed 42.5% est. |
| 58 | Saguache | 27.2 | 16.4% | 1,670 | Partially imputed 45.6% est. |
| 59 | Eagle | 27.2 | 16.1% | 35,609 | Partially imputed 21.7% est. |
| 60 | Weld | 27.0 | 17.7% | 123,439 | Full |
| 61 | Phillips | 26.9 | 16.5% | 1,793 | Heavily imputed 56.8% est. |
| 62 | Gilpin | 26.3 | 13.4% | 4,787 | Heavily imputed 86.4% est. |
| 63 | Rio Grande | 26.1 | 16.1% | 4,409 | Partially imputed 47.8% est. |
| 64 | Morgan | 24.7 | 14.3% | 13,239 | Partially imputed 48.0% est. |